• MVP Money Moves
  • Posts
  • Should You Just Buy The Index? Lessons From The S&P 500’s No Return Periods

Should You Just Buy The Index? Lessons From The S&P 500’s No Return Periods

Investing in the stock market often seems straightforward—put your money into a well-known index like the S&P 500 and watch it grow. However, relying solely on cap-weighted investing might not be the most effective strategy. The S&P 500, a cap-weighted index, has been through several extended periods where investors experienced no gains. Let's explore these periods and why diversifying beyond cap-weighted strategies is crucial.

What Is Cap-Weighted Investing?

Cap-weighted investing allocates investments based on companies' market capitalization or size. In the S&P 500, larger companies such as Apple and Microsoft significantly impact the index's performance more than smaller companies. As of August 2024, the largest ten (10) stocks in the S&P 500 comprise over 30% of the total index weight. This approach can lead to concentration risks, where a few large companies significantly influence the market's performance.

Historical Periods of No Return in the S&P 500 for the Past 100 Years

1929-1940: The Great Depression

From September 1929 to April 1940, the S&P 500 experienced 10.66 years of no return. The 1929 market crash and Great Depression caused severe economic hardship and a slow recovery.

1946-1950: Post-War Adjustment

The second period lasted from February 1946 to June 1950, spanning 4.41 years. After World War II, the U.S. economy shifted from wartime production to peacetime, causing an economic shift.

1968-1982: Stagflation Era

From January 1968 to August 1982, the S&P 500 experienced its longest period of no return, lasting 14.61 years. This period was marked by stagflation and the 1970s oil crisis.

2000-2013: Dot-Com Bust to Financial Crisis

The most recent period of no return, covering 12.95 years, was from March 2000 to March 2013. The dot-com bubble burst, and the 2008 financial crisis caused significant market volatility, resulting in no net gains for cap-weighted index investors.

No Return Periods Illustrated Below:

Duration Between No Return Periods

Understanding the gaps between these periods can provide additional insights. For example, the gap between the end of the first period (1940) and the start of the second period (1946) was approximately 5.76 years. The gap between the second and third periods was about 17.51 years, and between the third and fourth periods was roughly 17.62 years.

Why Cap-Weighted Investing Isn't Necessarily the Cure-All Strategy

  1. Concentration Risk: Cap-weighted indices can become overly dependent on the performance of a few large companies. As these companies underperform, the index generally suffers.

  2. Missed Opportunities: Smaller companies and sectors with growth potential might be underrepresented in cap-weighted indices, leading to missed investment opportunities.

  3. Economic Sensitivity: Cap-weighted indices can be highly sensitive to economic shifts, as seen in the historical periods of no return.

Stats to Consider

  • From January 2000 to March 2013, the S&P 500 had an average annual return of 0.28%.

  • Despite the long-term average annual return of approximately 9-10% for the S&P 500 (~100 years), it's essential to be aware of the potential risks associated with cap-weighted indices of extended no-return periods. These periods can significantly influence your financial decision-making process and, ultimately, your journey, highlighting the importance of asset allocation and risk management in your investment strategy.

Analogy

Investing solely in a cap-weighted index is like putting together a football team with all-star players focused on just a few key positions. Just as a successful football team needs skilled and harmonious players across the board to have a series of winning seasons, a diversified investment strategy that includes smaller companies, varied sectors, and multiple geographical areas can provide a more balanced approach and help reduce specific controllable risks.

FAQs

Q: What is cap-weighted investing?

A: Cap-weighted investing allocates investments based on companies' market capitalization, giving larger companies more influence on the index's performance.

Q: Why might cap-weighted investing not be the best strategy?

A: Cap-weighted investing can lead to concentration risks, missed opportunities, and increased sensitivity to economic shifts.

Q: What was the most prolonged period of no return for the S&P 500?

A: The longest period was from January 1968 to August 1982, lasting 14.61 years.

Q: Are periods of no return common in cap-weighted indices?

A: While not frequent, they do occur. Understanding these periods can help investors consider alternative strategies.

Q: How often do periods of no return occur?

A: Historical data shows varying durations between periods, ranging from a few years to over a decade.

Q: What should I do if my investments are in a period of no return?

A: Consider diversifying your portfolio and exploring alternative investment strategies beyond cap-weighted indices.

Understanding the limitations of cap-weighted investing can help you make more informed decisions and build a more resilient investment portfolio. Stay diversified, stay informed, and keep your investment goals in sight.

All information provided within this blog is for information, entertainment, education, or illustrative purposes only. The information is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice or any other advice that is general in nature and is not specific to you. None of the information is intended as investment advice, as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or as a recommendation, endorsement, or sponsorship of any security or company. All data has been taken from sources believed to be reliable and cannot be guaranteed. Any performance data shown in our illustrations and analytics may be hypothetical. Hypothetical results have certain inherent limitations. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investments involve risk, including the possible loss of principal. Blog posts may utilize the assistance of large language models and, therefore, may at times contain erroneous data or statements. The newsletter uses content from third parties, and such parties' views don't necessarily reflect the views of the newsletter. The accuracy or reliability of third-party content or links to the content is not verified or guaranteed. Reposted or linked material is not an endorsement.